Renault 'in much better shape' for 2016

Renault are adamant they have learned lessons from their 2015 downturn, and believe new measures they have already put in place mean they will hit the ground running next season.


Remi Taffin, Director of Operations, says the French manufacturer effectively tripped themselves up in 2015 by being too hasty in their bid to close the gap to the front. He is confident a subsequent 'return to basics' will produce a much clearer direction for the future.

"We arrived at the first winter test [of 2015] believing that we had made a big step forward between seasons. We genuinely thought that we had done a good job," Taffin explained.

"It was the case in certain areas, but we were caught out in three principal ways. The first was a significant reliability problem with the pistons. We had another part inside the PU electronics that we could not put our finger on and it continued to be a source of problems.

"The final element is that we braked so late for 2015, taking decisions until the last possible moment. The specification of PU for the first race was determined very late in the day and quite simply we braked too late, and we weren’t ready.

"We wanted to make up the gap so badly that we pulled the rug out from under our own feet... but this particular cocktail of problems did allow us to learn a lot and make sure that the same issues will not reoccur in the future.

"We end the season much more knowledgeable and information-rich - unfortunately we did not get the results we wanted, but everything has allowed us to prepare in the short term for 2016 and longer term beyond that.

"We are in much better shape now than we were at this point last year, for sure."

Taffin said Renault will also step up their work with highly-regarded Ilmor Engineering to aid the development of their power unit.

"They [Ilmor] were able to bring different concepts to the table, such as a different combustion concept, and now we will continue with them into 2016," Taffin said.

"We will continue to develop a lot in-house but with partners such as Ilmor we have a greater bandwidth and a richer experience and expertise. We did not see the full extent of the collaboration in 2015 for various reasons, but now they are under our control and we have a clearer direction we should see this more in 2016 and beyond."

Renault confirmed earlier this month that they will return to Formula One racing as a works entrant in 2016, having agreed a deal to acquire a controlling share in Lotus.

(source: f1.com)

The Fastest Lap in F1 History: Montoya at Monza

Fastest avarage speed ever on a lap in Formula One history.

Performance analysis - which team won the development race?

Mercedes may have been the undisputed class of the field in 2015, but in the race to develop their car over the entire season, four others teams managed to out-gun the Silver Arrows. We crunched the numbers to see who fared badly - and who emerged as the surprise winners...


Before we get to the reveal, the maths. We took a team's fastest overall lap from each weekend over the season - taken from whichever of their drivers was quickest - and expressed it as a percentage of the overall fastest time, which more often than not was the Q3 pole lap.

Doing it this way helps to eliminate variables - like one driver having a bad weekend, or a spate of unreliability or crashes - and drill down into each team's underlying pace on each race weekend, and across the season.

It also allows us to look at which teams improved - or lost ground - over the 19 races. Discounting the first race, in part because not every team was present and in part because Australia isn't always the most representative race, we took each team's average from races two, three and four, and compared that to the final three Grands Prix.

So who were the biggest gainers? Did McLaren get on top of their numerous issues, for example? And did the likes of Ferrari, Williams or Red Bull close on Mercedes?


GAINING GROUND







1. Force India

Early season average: 102.29%
End of season average: 101.27%
Gain: 1.014%

The stats don't lie: Force India gained the most ground of any team between the start and end of the season - and by some margin too.

In this regard, the team's poor start to the year played a significant role. Budget issues meant they missed much of pre-season, and were off the pace when the season began - although Nico Hulkenberg and Sergio Perez managed to rescue several points finishes.

The focus though was on the 'B-spec' car that was eventually introduced in Silverstone. Once optimised, this proved a massive step forward, with Force India's raw pace a match for Red Bull and Williams over the final three races.

2. Marussia

Early season average: 106.57%
End of season average: 106.24%
Gain: 0.323%

The slowest team on the grid typically have the biggest potential to improve, but even so Marussia deserve credit for closing the gap to Mercedes over 2015. Using a modified version of their 2014 car, and with obvious budget constraints, the team made steady progress over the season. With a new car for 2016, and Mercedes power, the ingredients are there to make a bigger step over the winter.

3. McLaren

Early season average: 102.90%
End of season average: 102.74%
Gain: 0.157%

Whatever the measure or statistic, this was a dismal season for the team from Woking. The Honda power unit was the obvious point of blame, as the 'size zero' concept led to numerous and insurmountable (at least in the short term) issues. McLaren did at least make progress relative to the outright pace, but their end-of-season average was still worse than every team bar Marussia.

Next year will be critical.

4. Red Bull

Early season average: 101.43%
End of season average: 101.27%
Gain: 0.154%

Like McLaren, Red Bull's progress over the 2015 season was hardly remarkable - but the latter did at least have less overall ground to make up. The good news for Red Bull is that they were a clear match for Williams by the end of the year, behind only Mercedes and Ferrari. Improve the power unit situation, and they should make a major jump forward in 2016.

The bad news? Red Bull's struggles weren't all engine-related - indeed a glance at the early season averages shows there was very little to separate the team from sister outfit Toro Rosso early on. The fact the gap grows between the two teams suggests Red Bull were able to start getting on top of the RB11 - which could bode well for next year.


NO CHANGE





5. Mercedes

Early season average: 100.00%
End of season average: 100.00%

A victim of their own success, at least in this one regard - Mercedes' crushing dominance in 2015 meant they 'gained' little ground over the season. They improved outright of course, bringing a relentless stream of upgrades throughout the season. But they also set the pace in 18 of 19 races this year, meaning their average was almost always 100 percent.

The one exception was Singapore, where Sebastian Vettel was legitimately fastest. In all other races, Mercedes had a pace advantage. That shows what a good job Ferrari and Vettel did to triumph three times, but it also emphasises the scale of the task every other team has to overhaul the Silver Arrows.

Such dominance might not always translate to fantastic racing, but there are encouraging signs in the data. Lewis Hamilton set the outright pace in 11 of the first 12 races (Nico Rosberg was faster in Spain), but then trailed his team mate in all of the last six. If Rosberg can keep that momentum up, we could have a fantastic fight for the title next year.


LOSING GROUND





6. Ferrari

Early season average: 100.58%
End of season average: 101.67%
Loss: 0.085%

Ferrari fell very slightly behind Mercedes over the course of 2015, although by a very small margin.

The team's high point came in Singapore, where Sebastian Vettel set the outright pace - as mentioned above, the only occasion all year where Mercedes didn't end up leading the way The German was typically the faster of Ferrari's two drivers, which meant his Q1 exit in Abu Dhabi - the result of a team miscalculation rather than a speed deficit - may have hurt their end-of-season average slightly. Even so, this was a good year for the Prancing Horse, as the team clearly established themselves as Mercedes' closest challengers.

7. Toro Rosso

Early season average: 101.77%
End of season average: 101.93%
Loss: 0.161%

Toro Rosso were a very close match for sister team Red Bull in the early stages of the season, a testament both to the STR10 chassis and the ability of their two rookie drivers, Max Verstappen and Carlos Sainz, who were two of the stars of the season.

They couldn't hold that pace over the year, however, and slipped back slightly. In the final three races, they were effectively in their own mini class - some way behind Mercedes, Ferrari, Williams, Red Bull and Force India, but equally some way ahead of Lotus, Sauber, McLaren and Marussia.

8. Williams

Early season average: 101.03%
End of season average: 101.25%
Loss: 0.225%

Williams made the call to halt development of their 2015 car once third in the constructors' championship was secured - which was reflected in the data, as the team dropped back into the clutches of Red Bull and Force India. The loss of momentum was especially evident in Abu Dhabi, where Williams were the fifth-best team in terms of pace. There are other slight concerns, like a number of pit stop errors and the fact they were nowhere when it rained in Austin - but the decision to focus on 2016 will only be vindicated one way or another when the new season starts.

9. Sauber

Early season average: 101.92%
End of season average: 102.45%
Loss: 0.528%

Sauber started the year fairly strongly - they had the same pace as Red Bull in Malaysia for example - but dropped away notably as the year progressed. Unfortunately for the Swiss squad this isn't exactly a new trend. Arresting the dynamic in 2016 might require changes to the typical methodology, but ending the season as the slowest team bar Marussia and McLaren is proof that action needs to be taken.

10. Lotus

Early season average: 101.64%
End of season average: 102.26%
Loss: 0.619%

Perhaps unsurprisingly, Lotus suffered the most during a season in which financial concerns dominated the team's outlook and potential. The team actually started very strongly, with the arrival of Mercedes power a significant benefit. Romain Grosjean too was in superlative form, somehow even capturing a podium at Spa-Francorchamps - a race where the team were the third fastest, in theory at least.

Performance plummeted, however, and by the final three races Lotus were fighting to stay ahead of Sauber and McLaren. A takeover by Renault should do much to alleviate the same sort of drop off next year.


The 2015 'Swingometer'

(source: f1.com)

Sky Sports F1 Tribute to Jules Bianchi

More Bianchi for you guys! :)

One of the brightest stars: A BBC tribute to Jules Bianchi

More Jules Bianchi :)

Pirelli announce tyre choices for 2016 season opener

Pirelli will make their red-marked supersoft tyre available in Australia for the first time next year, after revealing the three compounds that will be used in the 2016 season-opener under the new tyre regulations.


Teams will also be able to use the white-marked medium and yellow-marked soft compounds over the Melbourne weekend.

As part of the new 2016 rules, every team must save at least one set of the supersoft tyre for Q3. Those who qualify inside the top ten will have to give the tyre back to Pirelli at the end of qualifying, while those who do not make the cut can carry the extra set into the race.

Teams must also have at least one set of mediums and one set of softs available for the race - although they are only obligated to race with one of those two compounds (should they also choose to use the supersoft compound during the race).

With 13 sets of tyres in total made available over the weekend, teams have free choice over their individual allocations for the remaining 10 sets.

(source: f1.com)

A Tribute To Jules Bianchi (video)

This year we lost a great man. This year should be dedicated to him.